What you Need to Know about Anesthesia
Many parents believe their child can be protectedagainst the pain of circumcision through the use of anesthesia, but thereis no pain control method that is 100 percent effective. All infants sufferduring and after the procedure. There are risks from anesthesia andthere are risks if anesthesia is not used. If a baby is left intact,he is not subjected to any of these risks.
|DPNB - Dorsal Penile Nerve Block is more effective than EMLA but DPNB does not block the ventral nerve pain pathways so it is only partially effective. The infant still feels pain when DPNB is used. Lander et al reported that ring block is more effective than either EMLA or DPNB for control of circumcision pain. Excerpt from Pain of Circumcision and Pain Control by George Hill |
The shot itself can be very painful and the injection of local anesthesia into the penis can cause permanent vascular and nerve damage.
|EMLA is a topical anesthetic cream. Many parents are told it eliminates the pain of circumcision. Studies show it's only slightly effective. "Not only have Benini et al found that EMLA only relieves pain during approximately 1/3 of the procedure, but EMLA simply does not penetrate deeply enough to be very effective: During circumcision, the membranes are torn from the glans, the inner and outer layers are clamped, and the foreskin is cut away with a scalpel." Excerpt from Pain of Circumcision and Pain Control by George Hill |
EMLA is not recommended for infants under six months of age.
WARNING In August 1994 a Canadian hospitalissued a strongwarning against the use of Prilocaine and EMLA cream upon newborns. Theirhospital experienced a case where a few hours after his circumcision, a babydeveloped significant Methaemo-globinaemia [which can cause brain damageand death in small infants]. Two other cases of Methaemo-globinaemia dueto Prilocaine have occurred in British Columbia. [Canadian] Lidocaine hasbeen know to cause the same results.
Additionally, a recent survey by Garry and published inOBGManagement found that only 14 percent of US obstetricians who performcircumcision use any form of anesthesia for the surgery. A similar studyby Stang etal. in 1998 found that only 25 percent of OBs, 56 percent of familypractitioners, and 71 percent of pediatricians surveyed use anesthesia.Howard et al.reported in 1998 that 26 percent of circumcision training programs donot train doctors to use anesthesia/analgesia.
Quoting fromthe CNN article,CircumcisionStudy Halted Due to Trauma, "Up to 96% of babies in the U.S. andCanada receive no anesthesia when they are circumcised. ...It has also beenargued that injecting anesthesia can be as painful as the circumcision itself."
Dangerous Complications. Lander's study was terminated after several infants circumcised without anesthesia experienced apparent life threatening breathing difficulties, including choking and apnea. The shock of circumcision without anesthesia and extremely vigorous crying can produce additional dangerous complications including heart injury, pneumothorax and gastric rupture. Excerpt from Pain of Circumcision and Pain Control by George Hill
Just as the fingernail is fused to the finger,at birth the foreskin is fused to the glans.[Fleiss] In orderto remove it, the foreskin is pulled, torn, crushed and cut. We now knowthat babies actually feel pain more intensely than adults. [Anand] Most babiesscream wildly. Blood pressure and heart rate increases markedly. Some gointo severe shock, and lapse into a semi-comatose state. This is oftenmisunderstood by medical professionals who later insist that the baby experiencedno pain because they laid there without moving or crying. Babies continueto feel pain after the surgery.
Events that cause stress and pain appear to affecta babys feeding patterns. [*Marshall] Breastfeeding failure occursat a higher rate among circumcised babies. [Marshall] Newborns are acutelyaware of their mothers. When an infant suffers overwhelming pain, he cannotformulate the idea that this invasion was well intended. He can only assumethat his mother was somehow responsible. A common opinion is that the traumaof circumcision impairs maternal bonding and can cause psychological damage.[Laibow]
CHICAGO (AP) and AP-NY-12-24-97
Circumcision causes newborns a lot of pain, and they should always receive anesthesia for it, researchers say. Suffering caused by the procedure was so clear in a new study of anesthetics that researchers stopped enrollment early because they decided it was unethical to circumcise any more newborns without an anesthetic.
Rabbi Gerald Chirnomas of Boonton, N.J., who estimates that he has done more than 11,000 circumcisions without anesthesia or complications, disagreed. He says he discussed the issue with many urologists and never met one who favored injecting anesthetic into the penis. He thinks its very dangerous.
Which is Worse- Adult or Infant Circumcision?
With her express permission, Mothers Against Circumcision is featuring asensitive and thought provoking article by Jeannine Parvati Baker, a mother,midwife, writer and nominee for the Woman of the Year Award `93 for contributionsto Medicine.
Ending Circumcision:Where Sex and Violence First Meet
Strong warningagainst the use of Prilocaine and EMLAcream
The Birth ofPain by Maria Fitzgerald
Returnto You're Having a Baby
Return to Mothers AgainstCircumcision
Anand, K.J.S., Hickey, PR,Pain and its Effectsin the Human Neonate and Fetus, The New England Journal of Medicine,Vol. 317:21, November 19, 1987, pp. 1321-9.
Canadian Nurse, August 1994, pp. 5-6.
Fleiss, M.D. Paul M. and Frederick Hodges, The Foreskin is Necessary, inthe Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, April 1996.
Laibow, R. Circumcision: Relationship Attachment Impairment. NOCIRC InternationalSymposium on Circumcision, San Francisco, April, 1991:14.
*Marshall, RE, Stratton WC, Moore JA, Boxerman SB,Circumcision I: effectsupon newborn behavior. Infant Behav Dev. 1980;3:1-14
Marshall RE, Porter FL, Rogers AG, Moore J, Anderson B, Boxerman SB,Circumcision II: effectsupon mother-infant interaction. Early Human Development 1982;7:367-374